Because all of her psychotic, nasty, and vitriolic spew had been anonymous – i had no proof that it was her that has been stalking and harassing me. I knew it was her – but i had no proof…
Quite how people can read admissions like that and still think that Sperling has a shred of credibility is beyond me. All Ms Brown needs to do is place that comment in evidence, and the question of whether she made those comments need not be answered in the first place, since by Sperling’s own admission the allegation has no basis outside paranoia.
And in fact it’s worse than that. Not only is there no proof that the comments are from Ms Brown, there is actually proof (which has been provided to the court) that they are not from Ms Brown. But Sperling is so determined to paint the woman she hates as a stalker, she’s prepared to ignore evidence, claim court testimony is a perjury (funny that she’s just made that very testimony unnecessary!) and see a complaint laid against her (in large part because of those obsessions) as “final proof” that her paranoia is true.
All of which makes me wonder that she actually might believe her own fictitious story about all this.
This post is about Jacqueline (Jackie) Sperling, and is part of an ongoing series discussing her ongoing campaign of harassment and lies against lawyer Madeleine Flannagan, lawyer Simon Buckingham, and Ms Brown (her original target for harassment), as well as The Narrative - the alternate reality she presents on her blog in which she pretends to be the victim of her targets. You can read a court decision that outlines her campaign and the court’s assessment of The Narrative here. Please do not place abusive comments on her blog, phone her, or approach her or her family as she will blame this on her victims.