Hamas and Civilian Casualties


Was looking through my “Blog Later” links (which is full to bursting) and found this post by Michael J. Totten.

Some very good points.

Not only do Israelis have a harder time figuring out who is a target and who needs protection, we all have a harder time identifying those who have already been wounded and killed. Hamas says mostly civilians have been wounded and killed in the fighting in Gaza, but its fighters look just like everyone else. They can trot out the bodies of two dead terrorists in front of the cameras and say they’re civilians, thus easily fooling just about anyone. The number of civilian casualties, therefore, appears much higher than it really is. But even if that weren’t the case, far more civilians are being killed in this war because Hamas is fighting dirty.

Then there’s the multiple photos & videos of people who are clearly acting, posed, and/or being rushed to hospital in high drama for extremely minor injuries.

Israelis, in the meantime, go far out of their way to avoid harming the civilians of Gaza. They have even developed weapons for precisely this purpose.

“A new Israeli weapon,” Erlanger writes, “is tailored to the Hamas tactic of asking civilians to stand on the roofs of buildings so Israeli pilots will not bomb. The Israelis are countering with a missile designed, paradoxically, not to explode. They aim the missiles at empty areas of the roofs to frighten residents into leaving the buildings, a tactic called ‘a knock on the roof’.”

If Israelis were targeting civilians, as Hamas and hysterical critics like to claim, it ought to go without saying that they would never have developed a “weapon” that scatters civilians away for their own protection.

Activists, professors, journalists, bloggers, and other uninformed individuals may believe Israelis kill civilians either negligently or on purpose, but even Hamas knows that’s a lie. Otherwise, Hamas would not ask “civilians to stand on the roofs of buildings so Israeli pilots will not bomb,” as Erlanger reports.

Hamas knows the truth but uses its lie as a weapon. And it works. Millions all over the world believe Israel massacres civilians in Gaza and that claims to the contrary from the military are disinformation and smokescreen.

How many people believe that Israel is responsible for the flotilla deaths, in spite of all the video evidence blowing away any suggestion that the flotilla was peaceful?

Israelis, by contrast, don’t use human shields to deter Palestinian rocket attacks. The very idea is absurd. Hamas aims at civilians on purpose, as much as it can aim its crude rockets. A congregation of Israeli human shields would only make a bulls-eye at which Hamas could aim.

Indeed.

4 comments

  1. Where do I start?

    Do you mind if I ask why your moniker is not halfdone but halfwit?

    Michael Totten biffed me off his website quite some time ago after just a couple of posts – he is financed by Israeli interests so naturally his writing reflects that. Of course, I could have returned with another IP address but why bother?

    The first thing you must understand is that Gaza is in the top five most densely populated territories on this planet. 1.5 million people in an area the size of, maybe Mission Bay + Kohi?

    Look it up yourself.

    So what is the resistance supposed to do: stand in the open to be picked off like cattle?

    Second, I would say that it’s not easy standing on rooftops to deter Israel’s bombs, but Gazans do it anyway. I wonder why. And no, it’s not at gunpoint.

    Thirdly, Hamas does not target civilians. Their missiles are unguided. Yes, that says to us that they shouldn’t fire them, but shit happens.

    Tell you what, supply Hamas with guided missiles then complain about their targeting.

    Hamas arose because of Israeli oppression. Cease the oppression, Hamas becomes irrelevant. Simple.

    So tell me, Half whatever, how do we resolve the conflict?

    What’s your view of the endgame?

    1. Since you ask, what they should do is not start the fight in the first place. Then, they wouldn’t need to adopt the contrary positions which you admit they have.

      There’s unguided missiles, then there’s firing in directions you know have no military value.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: