International Cat Speculators Since 2006


 

Note: I have reviewed some of what I have said on this topic, and I am not too proud to concede that this post is unsatisfactory in hindsight – too long on insults and too short on exposing lies. However, I have written it so I will leave it up. All I ask is that people read the entire post. 

Jackie Sperling’s blog is very strong on irony, and way short on shame.

I watched 60 Minutes last night and i could not believe what i was listening to. If you missed it – the segment can be found at 60 Minutes – Hear no Evil.

Davina Murray is clearly delusional. It was almost like watching a case of Stockholm Syndrome being played out before my eyes.

Sperling has a case – she’s a recognized expert on what it takes to be delusional!

The craziest thing about this whole saga is that Davina Murray would not even be embarrassed by appearing on prime time, national television to defend Liam Reid and make ridiculous excuses in relation to the evidence in support of his guilt.

It remains to be seen if LMC is deluded enough to agree to face the public on prime time, but she certainly is prepared to lie about court judgements on her blog.

I notice that she never did answer whether or not she smuggled the Iphone and cigarettes in to the prison. Her only reference to that was to comment on the repercussions if she is found guilty.

Yes, there’s some topics best avoided – such as those old posts that didn’t fit The Narrative…

Delusional people are shocking me less and less these days – but that doesn’t make them any easier to understand. Davina Murray is in her own world. She cannot see reality.

Like the person who wrote this:

He has clearly stated though that they had not suffered any “distress” due to anything that i had written and that if they had suffered “distress” that was caused by them – and their refusal to stop reading my blog. He has stated that a reasonable person in their position would not have suffered distress due to my actions. 

In response to a judgement that contained this:

In my view a reasonable person in her circumstances would not be distressed by the posts with one exception. I am of the view that the post about her pain killer addiction which was forwarded to her employers would have been subjectively and objectively distressing. However, it does not justify the making of a restraining order. Ms Flannagan has had an opportunity to explain her position with her employers and it appears that the matter is behind her.

(For those who don’t get the implication, “explain her position with her employers” means Madeleine was able to convince her skeptical boss that LMC is nuts and lies a whole lot.

Incidentally, I hear that Sperling’s reaction to legal proceedings being filed cleared up any doubt in her employer’s mind on that particular matter.)

Having an education, a career, or being a lawyer is clearly not proof of sanity.

Ok, there’s a cheap shot that can be taken here.

But I’m not going there. I actually respect someone who’s walked away from the life that Ms Sperling once lived.

My problem here is not her history, it’s what she’s doing with her present, and the fact that while she appears ready to move on from her past of damaging herself, she’s instead shifted to damaging those whom she comes across in her day to day life.

————————

This post is about Jacqueline (Jackie) Sperling, and is part of an ongoing series discussing her ongoing campaign of harassment and lies against lawyer Madeleine Flannagan and Ms Brown, and The Narrative – the alternate reality she presents on her blog in which she pretends to be the victim of her targets. You can read a court decision that outlines her campaign and the court’s assessment of The Narrative here.

Please do not place abusive comments on her blog, phone her, or approach her or her family as she will blame this on her victims.

Advertisements

Comments on: "If LMC says you’re delusional…" (3)

  1. zechariah8v16 said:

    Something doesn’t look quite right here…

    “In response to a judgement that contained this:

    In my view a reasonable person in her circumstances would not be distresse
    (For those who don’t get the implication, “explain her position with her employers” means Madeline was able to convince her skeptical boss that LMC is nuts and lies a whole lot.”

    Apart from the missing “d” at the end of “distressed”, the rest of the comment containing “explain her position” is missing too. Or is it just my computer?

    What can’t I see?

  2. […] the decision, or even acknowledge that it states clearly that she is the aggressor, but has posted several out of context quotes from […]

Comments are closed.

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: