International Cat Speculators Since 2006

Attack – fail


Well, tonight Sperling wrote a rather pathetic post dredging up an incident from Madeleine’s past and telling some lies that are even less believable than usual.

(It was designed to undermine their fundraising efforts I’ve discussed before.)

It seems to have worked though.

Before (10pm ish from her post)

After: (11pm ish from MandM)

Massive fail.

Not only has she told a very revealing lie, but she’s now opened up criticism of her very shady past.

I suspect that post won’t be up very long.

Update: I hear that the backfire was even more spectacular than anticipated. I’d love to spill the beans, but it’smuch more fun to leave certain people guessing.

————————

This post is about Jacqueline (Jackie) Sperling, and is part of an ongoing series discussing her ongoing campaign of harassment and lies against lawyer Madeleine Flannagan and Ms Brown, and The Narrative – the alternate reality she presents on her blog in which she pretends to be the victim of her targets. You can read a court decision that outlines her campaign and the court’s assessment of The Narrative here.

Please do not place abusive comments on her blog, phone her, or approach her or her family as she will blame this on her victims.

Advertisements

Comments on: "Attack – fail" (4)

  1. ciarona said:

    Is she trying to negate any future action by tagging the post “humour”???

    • Adeleine said:

      Well it was, you have to admit, hysterically roll around the floor laughing funny, when she said that a lawyer kept and spent funds donated for a charitable purpose and that the lawyer committed theft last year.

      </sarcasm

      When you consider the comments in their continuum (to channel Judge Harvey) and you recall her comments on other posts and her blog post about MandM secretly being loaded but begging, Matt being a pastor who is like Brian Tamaki, anyone can see she's not intending jest at all.

  2. […] And yesterday’s second attempt at undermining M&M’s fundraising described in the previous post makes 59. […]

  3. […] posts including Madeline’s husband’s bank account details (submitted for the lawsuit) and many claims that Madeline is an incompetent lawyer (which the trial judge rejected explicitly in his […]

Comments are closed.

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: